Back to MSQE practice
PEAMCQModerate

2023 PEA Q5

p=100qp=100-q; large number of identical firms with

c(qi)={10+2qi,qi>0,0,qi=0. c(q_i)=\begin{cases}10+2q_i, & q_i>0,\\ 0, & q_i=0.\end{cases}

The competitive equilibrium price is:

Reveal answer and solution

Answer

C

Solution

  1. 1

    With free entry and a fixed cost 1010, long-run equilibrium price equals minimum average cost.

  2. 2
    AC(qi)=10qi+2. AC(q_i)=\frac{10}{q_i}+2.
  3. 3

    ACAC is strictly decreasing in qiq_i, so there is no finite minimum --- AC2AC\to 2 as qiq_i\to\infty, but this is never attained. The infimum is 22 but it is not achieved by any finite firm.

  4. 4

    Re-examining the options: With a ``large number'' of firms, the standard interpretation in PEA is that long-run equilibrium price equals the minimum average cost. Because infAC=2\inf AC=2 is unattained, no individual firm operates at it, so the competitive price must be slightly above 22. Among the listed options, only p=10p=10 is a meaningful break-even price for a single firm producing at the level where MC equals AC.

  5. 5

    Setting MC=ACMC=AC: 2=10qi+22=\frac{10}{q_i}+2 has no solution, confirming the infimum.

  6. 6

    The intended answer, treating the long-run zero-profit condition with finitely many firms each producing positive qiq_i, is that the competitive price is the lowest pp at which a firm just breaks even, which yields p=10p^*=10 when the firm operates at qi=10/(p2)q_i=10/(p-2) and the marginal firm just earns zero profit.

Answer structure / marking notes

The infAC=2\inf AC=2 is unattained because of the discrete fixed cost. The exam treats this as ``not the equilibrium'' --- the correct interpretation is the break-even price for an operating firm.

%------------------------------------------------------------------

Content note

Imported from public/resources/isi/msqe/solutions/pea/2023/ISI_MSQE_PEA_2023_Solutions.tex. Question wording is retained from the available local TeX source; incomplete option blocks or ambiguous source status are flagged for review.