Back to MSQE practice
PEAMCQHard

2025 PEA Q26

xyx \succ y iff (i) xa+xb>ya+ybx_a + x_b > y_a + y_b, or (ii) xa+xb=ya+ybx_a + x_b = y_a + y_b and xa>yax_a > y_a. Which statements are true?

I. da=w/pad_a = w/p_a if pa<pbp_a < p_b. \quad II. da=w/pad_a = w/p_a if papbp_a \le p_b. \quad III. da=0d_a = 0 if pbpap_b \le p_a. \quad IV. db=w/pbd_b = w/p_b if pb<pap_b < p_a. \quad V. db=0d_b = 0 if pb<pap_b < p_a.

Reveal answer and solution

Answer

B

Solution

  1. 1

    The consumer first maximises xa+xbx_a + x_b subject to paxa+pbxb=wp_a x_a + p_b x_b = w. To maximise the sum, spend all income on the cheaper good. Tie-breaker: if pa=pbp_a = p_b, choose the bundle with more apples (rule (ii)), i.e.\ all-apples.

  2. 2

    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]

  3. 3
    • If pa<pbp_a < p_b: cheaper good is aa. da=w/pad_a = w/p_a, db=0d_b = 0.
  4. 4
    • If pa=pbp_a = p_b: indifferent in sum; tie-break to apples: da=w/pad_a = w/p_a, db=0d_b = 0.
  5. 5
    • If pa>pbp_a > p_b: cheaper good is bb. da=0d_a = 0, db=w/pbd_b = w/p_b.
  6. 6

    \end{itemize}

  7. 7

    Hence:

  8. 8

    \begin{itemize}[leftmargin=*]

  9. 9
    • I (strict <<) --- TRUE.
  10. 10
    • II (\le) --- TRUE (tie-break gives all apples).
  11. 11
    • III (pbpap_b \le p_a) --- if pb=pap_b = p_a, the tie-break gives apples, so da0d_a \ne 0. FALSE.
  12. 12
    • IV (pb<pap_b < p_a) --- TRUE.
  13. 13
    • V (pb<pap_b < p_a) --- db=w/pb>0d_b = w/p_b > 0, so db=0d_b = 0 is FALSE.
  14. 14

    \end{itemize}

  15. 15

    True statements: II and IV.

Answer structure / marking notes

Wait: re-evaluating III. For III, pbpap_b \le p_a means cheaper is bb (or tie). If pb<pap_b < p_a, da=0d_a = 0, so III holds in that subcase. But at pb=pap_b = p_a, the tie-break gives apples, so da=w/pa0d_a = w/p_a \ne 0, breaking III. So III fails on the boundary. II requires papbp_a \le p_b: if pa<pbp_a < p_b, da=w/pad_a = w/p_a holds; if pa=pbp_a = p_b, tie-break gives apples, so da=w/pad_a = w/p_a still holds. So II is true. IV: pb<pap_b < p_a strict, so db=w/pbd_b = w/p_b. True. Final pair: II and IV \Rightarrow Option (C).

Correction: Final answer (C).

Option C \boxed{\text{Option C}}

Trap

The tie-breaking on equal prices is the subtle point: at pa=pbp_a = p_b, apples win, so III fails.

Final answer (after correction): Hmm, the printed answer key gives option (B) ``II and III''. Re-examine III. At pb=pap_b = p_a in III's condition pbpap_b \le p_a, the sum-maximisation is indifferent and the lexicographic tie-break gives all apples; thus da0d_a \ne 0. So III is false. The correct pair is II and IV, option (C).

Option C \boxed{\text{Option C}}

%==========================================

Content note

Imported from public/resources/isi/msqe/solutions/pea/2025/ISI_MSQE_PEA_2025_Solutions.tex. Question wording is retained from the available local TeX source; incomplete option blocks or ambiguous source status are flagged for review.