2026 PEA Q30
A two-period consumer maximises
subject to and , with . If rises by and falls by , then
Reveal answer and solution
Answer
B
Solution
- 1
Substitute into and differentiate w.r.t.\ :
- 2
- 3
A cleaner derivation: the Euler equation , combined with the lifetime budget constraint , gives
- 4
- 5
Therefore
- 6
- 7
This is the well-known log-utility result: *saving is proportional to wage
- 8
and independent of * (income and substitution effects of an interest-rate
- 9
change cancel exactly under log preferences).
- 10
Since depends only on (not on ):
- 11
\begin{itemize}
- 12
- A rise in raises by exactly .
- 13
- A fall in leaves unchanged.
- 14
\end{itemize}
- 15
Therefore rises by exactly .
Answer structure / marking notes
Under log utility the income and substitution effects of a change in on saving cancel out exactly; this is a special property of log preferences.
%-------------------------------------------------- \newpage
Review Flags
Question 18. As transcribed (with , and production constraint ), the Samuelson condition yields , which is not among the printed options . The problem statement (likely the utility functions or the production technology in the underlying source) should be verified before finalising the option choice.
All other questions are flagged as either Verified or Draft (see the Answer-Key Summary at the front of this booklet).
\hrule
\begin{center} \textit{End of PEA Solutions --- ISI MSQE 2026, prepared for Statstrive.} \end{center}
Content note
Imported from public/resources/isi/msqe/solutions/pea/2026/ISI_MSQE_PEA_2026_Solutions.tex. Question wording is retained from the available local TeX source; incomplete option blocks or ambiguous source status are flagged for review.
